Monday, March 31, 2008

Browsing Habits Based on Wi-Fi Usage

Every now and then I'm out somewhere that offers public Wi-Fi. This is a great thing, and I'm always happy to see places that have it. It's really becoming more and more prevalent, showing up in many bars, most every coffee place, Wi-Fi Sign in Windowand tons of other locations. There is one problem, though, and that is how much can you trust it? When you are using the Wi-Fi provided there, you expose yourself to all sorts of dangers. Given their openness, someone with nefarious intentions could really pose a threat. With the right tools and know how, someone could monitor all of your traffic, and do with it as they please. This seems to be something that is becoming more common knowledge, but there are still a lot of users out there that just don't think about this. I'm not here to teach you Wi-Fi safety, though. If you want that, you can head to CNET for a basic lesson on protection at public Wi-Fi hotspots, or just look to our friend Google.

I'm here to see what you find your usage habits to be when you are on a network that is not your own. I was thinking about this when I was at WordCamp this weekend. Just like a good conference should, they provided open Wi-Fi for everyone to use, and I'm willing to bet everyone did. While there, people did everything from logging in to their email to logging in to their web servers. These are things that you want to keep secure, yet people are logging in on an open network that is being heavily used. The thought, of course, is that the group at a conference like that is hopefully not going to be interested in doing bad things, but you never know. I would be interested to know if they maintained the same browsing habits if they were at their local coffee shop. Would they feel more or less safe there? In addition to using their emails and such, did anyone do any shopping? Check their bank account?

Personally, I usually try to error on the side of caution. This weekend I was logging in to my server, email, and other things just like everyone else. When I'm out at a random place, I usually Caution Tapewon't log in to certain things. If I'm on any network but my own, I never log in to any financial related site, nor do I do anything where I enter a credit card. There are some places that I won't log into anything from. Maybe I'm overly paranoid, maybe I'm pretty normal. I know there are people that don't seem to be as cautious, though, since I've seen people logging on their bank sites while at Starbucks. What about you. How does your internet usage change based on where you are?

Labels: ,

Saturday, March 29, 2008

Learning Things at WordCamp Dallas

I'm at WordCamp Dallas and we're just barely over halfway into day one and I'm already learning some stuff.  First, I'm already thinking that I like the stuff that WordPress has to offer.  I am thinking that when I get some free time (not any time soon) that I'll migrate my site over to it.  I'm also picking up a lot of tips that I'm going to try to implement.  John P from One Mans Blog had a talk of 45 Ways to Power up Your Blog that contain a number of useful things that I want to try too.  He also had a really awesome statistics tool called Woopra that looks incredibly cool and I'm going to play with it soon.  Lots of cool stuff going on here, I'm really enjoying it.

Labels: ,

Thursday, March 27, 2008

Finding New Things with FriendFeed

I find myself becoming addicted to FriendFeed.  I started using the service about a day or two before it exploded everywhere.  I find that I"m actually discovering a number of things just by leaving it up all day.  Not only do I love finding out what's going on with the people I'm following, but their "everyone" public feed is great too.  Every now and then I'll click over there and just watch the stream of stuff coming from a ton of people, and I don't even know who they are.  Today I thought I'd see what searching for Dallas (where I am) in the public stream would get me.  I actually discovered that there's a WordCamp event this weekend here as a result.  I have no idea how I missed hearing about this before.  I'm thinking that since it is a WordPress thing, and I don't use WP, that I just passed over it if I saw it somewhere.  However, I'm now trying to figure out my weekend schedule and try to go.  It would be great to go and network with people, and try to learn more about WordPress.  And to think that I never would have seen this had it not been for FriendFeed.

Labels: ,

Wednesday, March 26, 2008

It's a Cubicle World

I work in an atrium building so you can see into the offices on each floor.  Riding the elevator up to my floor, I see that almost every floor is populated with cubes.  Most of the people I know work in cubes.  I work in a cube.  This is nothing new, offices using cubes to house workers has been going on forever. They site all sorts of reasons for why they do it, trying to pass it off on the employees as if it is a benefit to them.  The truth, though,  is that it's cheap to use cubes.  I don't blame them at all for this, I'm all about cutting costs.  I honestly don't care about having to work in a cube, I don't feel like it demeans me or anything like that (as seems to be the case with a lot of people).  I do have a problem with my office using cubes, though.  I have a feeling that most of my problem is that I wasn't always in a cube.  When I first started working here, I had my own office.  This office was located down at the end of a hallway, and there was nothing else there.  The only reason anyone had to be down that hallway was to see me, and I don't get a lot of visitors.  This meant that I had pretty much zero distractions, and the only noise was that which I made.  My productivity was great.  I could focus on what I needed to, and I didn't have to deal with anything going on around me because there was nothing around me.  I had my own office for a while, and then they moved someone in with me.  This wasn't too bad, though the distractions did increase quite a bit.  Every time she was on the phone, had a visitor (she had a lot due to her job), or just wanted to talk to me, that would hurt my productivity.  As a result, the volume of work I could do took a hit.  That lasted for a while, and then we all moved into cubes.  Now I've got people all around me.  The lady next to me, she's great and I like her, but she's on the phone all the time (work and personal), and she's loud.  I keep turning my music in my headphones up, but that only does so much.  I've got a lot of foot traffic coming by now, and people feel like just stopping by to talk.  I've got people that just yell over the cubes to each other when they have a question about something.  The guy next to me is constantly getting into arguments with people on the phone (he is the guy that reviews all the contracts, so he is making sure people stay in line, which they don't like to do), and he is loud too.  Basically, I have tons of noise and distractions going on.  As a result of this, my productivity is just shot.  I can definitely see how some people could benefit from being in a cube environment, but I'm a financial analyst for Pete's sake, and my job doesn't really see any benefit from others around.  Not to mention the fact that I work with confidential information, and am basically out in the open here.  Why don't companies understand that the cost savings of sticking everyone in cubes may not be greater than the loss of productivity?  Is that always going to be the case?  No, of course not.  Do I think it's the case for me and some other people here?  Yeah, definitely.  I don't feel like I should get anything special, I just want four walls and a door so that I can shut out the world and get some work done.

Oh, did I mention that the location of my cube is such that when the receptionist isn't at her desk I'm the one that gets the door? That happens a lot.

Labels: ,

Tuesday, March 25, 2008

Tweet Tweet, Feed me a Friend

I've known about Twitter for quite some time. It took me forever to actually sign up, but I finally did. The sign up screen told me to say what I was doing, so I typed in living, and that was that. I didn't sign on again for months. I really wanted to use it, since it was so popular amongst the people that I followed online. There was only one problem, and that was that no one I knew in real life used the service. I can easily understand how great this thing could be, but without actually having anyone I knew personally on there, it didn't seem to do my much good. I told people that I knew about it, but they weren't interested. In the end, I just couldn't bring myself to use the service, since it didn't do me a lot of good to know what Leo Laporte was doing for dinner. I thought about trying to follow it just to see the interesting things, and ignore the rest, but I never did get into it. Then, I was listening to an episode of net at night and they mentioned some new service called FriendFeed. It sounded like a nifty little service. You can sign up, and put in all the services that you use, and it will import all of the updates that you make on those services into a feed. Then, other people can decide to subscribe to your feed so that whenever you make any update to any of the services you're on, it immediately updates your FriendFeed, and all of your subscribers can see it in one place. These sorts of things are called lifestreaming services. Apparently, there are a number of them out there. Another popular one I've seen in called socialthing!. I've not used it, though, so I can't provide any first hand information about it. However, I don't need to since other people already have. The thing is, most of the traffic I see on my FriendFeed is from Twitter. I'm finding myself discovering a lot of new things just by watching the stream of updates that come through from the handful of people I'm subscribed to on FF. This made me want to use Twitter even more. On top of that, to hear things like what Scoble describes just sounds awesome. So now I'm finding myself actually more interested in Twitter because of FF. Also, since FriendFeed now lets you respond to Tweets (those are messages posted on Twitter) through your FF page, it is even more compelling for me to use. I still am faced with the problem that I don't really know of anyone in real life that uses, or even knows about this service. Perhaps I need to work harder on spreading the word.

Labels: ,

Monday, March 17, 2008

Open the Tubes

So this is pretty cool, I think.  Michael Arrington is reporting on TechCruch some results of being put on the Yahoo! homepage via their new Buzz service. I'll be honest and tell you that I've never even heard of this new Buzz thing before, but I've been a bit out of it lately.  It sounds like it's another Digg clone with a slight twist.  Stories that get voted high enough will make it to the front page of Yahoo!.  That means that if you get up there, you'll have the potential of a whole lot of traffic.  That's precisely what happens, too, based on Arrington's post.  In the online world, there is something known as the Slashdot Effect, and more recently the Digg Effect.  This is when a link becomes popular on the Slashdot or Digg sites, and suddenly has a ton of visitors.  While I'm not sure exactly how many people this sends over, it's considerable, but nothing like what Yahoo! can do.  None of this is my point, though.  What I found really interesting is what this means for broadening people's views.  The demographic of sites like Slashdot or Digg is pretty much nerdy pasty kids that are under 28, and probably have as much porn on their computers as you have music.  The vast majority of the public has never even heard of these sites.  However, a ton of people go to Yahoo.com everyday.  While a site like TechCruch probably makes it pretty high on Digg everyday, your typical Yahoo! user doesn't even know it exists.  What this means is that people who may usually be completely oblivious about some things online are suddenly seeing it linked to off their homepage.  These people may click through to a story on some tech site, and find it interesting enough to read something else there.  At this point, I should probably admit that this is an entirely selfish enjoyment I have for this new service.  Basically, it means that your average Joe (or Jane) now has potential to know just what the heck I'm talking about when I mention something I read online.  To me, that's pretty darn cool.  The trick, then, is to get these normally geek-centric sites to be appealing enough to attract the typical Yahoo! user (that is, assuming they even want them sticking around).  I'm basing that on the assumption that having one million users coming from Yahoo! is actually a beneficial thing for the site.

Labels: , ,

Sunday, March 16, 2008

Just Like Ol' Times

Years ago when I first started writing on here the main thing that I would write about was movies.  I used to watch a ton of movies, and so I'd give short little "reviews" of them after I watched one.  This was good because it meant that I had at least one thing to write about close to every day.  Now, however, I don't watch nearly as many movies as I used to, and when I do I really don't post about them.  This last week, though, has been a different story, and I've watched a number of things so I thought I would share.

ree_poster The first one is Resident Evil: Extinction. The Resident Evil series is one of those rarities where they made a movie based on a game and it wasn't horrible.  I actually never played the games, but I've enjoyed the movies for some good old fashion zombie shoot 'em up entertainment.  I picked this one up on a Friday night where I had no intentions of doing anything other than sitting on the couch with a beer and a movie and just veging out.  I think that I prefer the first movie of this trilogy over the other two, but this one wasn't a let down.  While I wouldn't go giving this movie five stars or anything, it is worth watching if you enjoyed the first ones, or just are a fan of watching girls shoot zombies.  I figure that if you're really into the series that you would have seen this one by now anyway. While I wouldn't say that you need to have seen the previous movies to understand this one, it would at least help to explain a couple of things.  The movie can stand on its own, though, as I don't recall there being any major plot points that wouldn't make sense if you hadn't seen the others.

bu_posterI was in a trilogy mood last weekend and the second movie I picked up was the Bourne Ultimatum.   I love the Jason Bourne series.  Many years ago, before the movies came out, a friend of mine had tried to get me to read the series, but I never got around to it.  Sadly, I still haven't, but I'm much more likely to after seeing the movies.  I figure that since books are usually better than the movie, and these movies were so good, then the books must be awesome.  I would definitely say that this movie is a true third installment, as in, you don't want to see it unless you've see the first two.  I like that in these movies that things stay fairly true, and there aren't a lot of over the top scenarios.  The action scenes are pretty exciting, and the plot isn't cheesy and really predictable.  I didn't used to be huge on Matt Damon, but this series has really made me like him more.  He does a great job playing Bourne.  If you have seen the first two, but haven't seen this by now, you should.  If you haven't seen any of the trilogy, you should definitely check it out. 

hm_poster This Friday night was another didn't want to think, get a mindless movie based on a game night.  This time, the movie of choice was Hitman.  I have played a couple of the games in the series, but never the first one.  I think that I heard that the movie is based on the first game of the series, but I don't know for sure.  To be honest, I was not expecting anything out of this movie other than some bad plot, lame lines, and a bunch of shooting.  I was pleasantly surprised, though, that it actually turned out to be pretty good.  The plot was pretty decent, and not entirely without depth.  I wasn't sure what to expect from having Timothy Olyphant play 47, but he didn't do too bad.  There were certainly some parts that I don't think matched up too well with the game (come on, you lose points for having witnesses, you really shouldn't leave any), but from what I know of the series they did a decent job.  I'm not sure if one of the reasons I enjoyed this movie as much as I did is because I had such low expectations, or if it was genuinely that good.  My friends, whom I don't think had as low of expectations as me, and had never played any of the games, thought it was pretty good too, though.  There are definitely some fun action scenes, which was really all I was looking for.  The soundtrack also bears mentioning.  The game had a pretty nice soundtrack, and I noticed some of the same songs showing up in the movie.  They have some good music in there, though.  While I wouldn't say this movie is for everyone, obviously, it is a fun action movie.  Don't expect anything too heady from it, but it is definitely some good entertainment.

gc_poster This next movie is just downright interesting.  It's this Korean movie called Green Chair.  My I saw it on my roommate's Facebook page so I got it for us to watch.  She didn't want to watch it with me, though, as she said it'd be too uncomfortable.  After seeing it, I can understand why she said that, but not sure if I agree.  The thing is, there's about ten minutes of opening story, then what feels like 30 minutes of them having sex.  The point is to demonstrate the intimacy and nature of their relationship, but that really could have been accomplished in significantly less time.  This movie definitely confirms my hypothesis that Korean chicks are crazy, though.  The story is that an older lady has sex with a younger guy, goes to jail because of it, and then gets out and he's there to greet her.  That's the beginning of it. The rest of the movie is how they are having this relationship, and the ups and downs of it.  There is also an inordinate amount of eating.  Pretty much, if the scene doesn't involve sex, it involves food.  Despite what my roommate thinks, I really didn't think that the sex was all that explicit.  I've seen worse in American mainstream movies.  That's not to say that a kid should watch this.  It's not rated here, but would definitely be a hard R.  While hardly a romantic comedy, there are a lot of things that are amusing, and I laughed a number of times.  There is also a lot that confused me.  I'm not sure if it's just a cultural thing, or what, but there are parts that don't seem to add up for me.  The end of the movie is especially odd.  If the director were to tell me that the end of the movie was all a dream, I'd think that made more sense than if he said it actually happened.  It just doesn't make any sense whatsoever.  My roommate doesn't agree, and thinks that it is cheesy, but completely real.  I don't think cheesy is the term I thought of when watching it, but rather WTF?  I can't say that I recommend this movie, but I also wouldn't discourage watching it.  If you want some more insight into how crazy ladies are, and don't mind a bunch of sex, then go for it. Otherwise, go ahead and pass.

nc_poster The last movie I watched in the last seven days was No Country for Old Men.  This one had gobs of buzz made about it.  It won some awards, I think, too.  People I know that saw it all said it was great.  I figured I should check it out.  While I will say that this was a good movie, it is hardly deserving of all the accolades it has received.  The story was good, the acting was good, the movie was good, but it wasn't that good.  The end of the movie is definitely what got me. I don't like how they did it, at all.  I've got no problem with what the final outcome was, but how they got there really bugged me.  Things that I would have liked to see expanded upon are just brushed over.  Pieces of information are just left out.  I feel like they just flew over some things out that should have been included.  Up until that point, I felt like they were doing a pretty good job.  Don't think I'm trying to discourage watching it, though.  It is a bit on the violent side, though.  Javier Bardem does a really good job of playing a creepy psycho.  You really don't like him much at all, which I'm thinking is what they were going for.  All in all, I'd say that this is worth watching, but all the hype surrounding it is just that, hype.

Labels:

Thursday, March 6, 2008

More Election Brilliance

As a lot of you know, I live in Texas and March 4 was our big day.  Of course, that means that there's going to be a lot of stuff about the elections that are from here on the local level.  I was reading one of the local papers here yesterday, and they were interviewing some people after they had voted.  One of the things that they were honing in on was the way that females were voting.  They were talking about how ladies had a difficult choice to make between voting for Hillary, because she's a woman, or voting for Obama, because they agree with him on things.  Here's one of the good quotes, talking about women that like Obama.

"...and some of Obama's biggest fans were unable to vote for him, fearing a vote against Clinton would be a vote against their gender."

Hmm, so that's a good idea.  Let's not vote for who we think will be the better president, and instead vote for someone just because they're the same sex as us.  The reasons that some people have for voting astound me.  If the reason that you are voting for someone is just because they are black, or a girl, or an old rich white guy, then you really don't need to be voting.  Vote based on character, on where they stand on issues, and on how well you think they'd do the job.  People need to vote for someone that they want to be president because they think they would be the best president, not because they want them to be the first black, first woman, or oldest. 

On a somewhat related note, if you actually did want to vote for Hillary, check out what Lawrence Lessig has to say about it, it's very interesting.

Labels: , ,