MIA, AT&T, and a Horror Story
I know, I know. I've once again been MIA for quite some time. I have much better excuses this time, though. This time it includes more than me just being lazy.
First, my grandmother died a few weeks ago. Between living at the hospital for a couple days, and then all of the craziness that followed, that put me off the grid for about a week. Since then, I've just been trying desperately to catch back up with everything. Before that happened, things at work were going at just the right pace where I could work and not worry about deadlines. Now, though, I'm still about a week or two behind. It's amazing how things will snowball like that. Missing a week suddenly puts you behind three. So I've been working a ton lately, and that usually means that when I get home it's either late or I have no desire to do anything but vege. All of that, though, means that not only have I not really had time to write, but I've also not had time to read. There were a couple of things that would catch my eye, but they're all considerably old news now. Oh well.
Since most topics I was going to mention have pretty much come and gone, I'll just briefly touch on a couple. Both about AT&T. First, if you follow those links in the last sentence, you'll see the story about AT&T's new terms of service that basically said that they could disconnect you as a customer if you said things that were critical of the company. While that does seem a bit absurd, I honestly would not doubt AT&T to do it. The second article, though, is where they retracted on that, and said they never meant it to mean that they'd actually disconnect someone for being critical. Yeah, right.
The other item about AT&T hits close to home. I started doing some searching to find out just why telecom companies are allowed to have exclusive deals with apartment and condo communities. This really pisses me off that they do that (like pisses me off more than you can even imagine). Well in the course of my searching, I found a fairly recent post about the FCC looking into prohibiting these exclusive deals. One of the chief proponents of barring such contracts? AT&T. I feel a bit dirty, but I am actually rooting for AT&T here. Ironically, AT&T thinks that if they get these contracts banned that they'll sign up more customers, all the while I'm going to jump ship from them first chance that comes along. Companies with cheaper, better service provide for my area, but I can't get them because my complex has a contract with AT&T. Oh, wait, not all of my complex, just half of my complex. If I were living in the building across from mine, I wouldn't have this problem.
I'll close with a horror story that will make you just angry and saddened at the same time. Go check out this post on this lady's blog, and then read in order all of the ones after it. Yes, it's a number of posts. Yes, it's worth the read. Here's the gist of it: Concerned parents take baby to doctor, hospital calls CPS, CPS takes away baby from non-abusive parents. The lady is actually a friend of a friend, so she's vouched for and isn't writing BS. Check it out, it's just crazy.

